Social networking maps political landscape in
2010 in UK General Election
London, UK – 14 May 2010 – Alterian (LSE: ALN), a leader in
customer engagement technology and solutions, today released
further statistics, which showed how the conversations on social
media sites reflected the events of the 2010 UK General Election.
SM2, Alterian’s social monitoring tool, examined over 500,000
conversations across various social media platforms, providing
volume and sentiment analysis of the main political leaders over
the course of the election.
For the purposes of measurement, the election campaign was
divided into three time periods - the Pre-Debate period, the Debate
period and the Election period. From the results of SM2, Alterian
has mapped the key highlights and lowlights of the election
campaign.
In the 224,139 conversations tracked during the Pre-Debate
period (26th February to 14th April), Gordon Brown enjoyed an
overwhelming volume percentage of conversations – 70 percent.
During this stage, David Cameron only received a volume of 24
percent, with Clegg receiving 6 percent. As the incumbent, it is
not surprising that Brown had the largest amount of conversations
at this stage before the opposition had started campaigning in
earnest.

As well as volume, SM2 also measures sentiment, an important
variable that reveals the public appeal of each party leader.
During the Pre-Debate period, a large and consistent amount of
neutral sentiment was felt for all three party leaders. This can be
explained by the fact that prior to the debate (before manifestos
were released) there was nothing significantly contentious or
controversial to split the public’s emotions. It is reasonable to
conclude that each individual held their pre-existing opinions of
the party leaders. Having said that, Nick Clegg received a higher
percentage of positive mentions than negative during this period.
Both Gordon Brown and David Cameron had more negative than positive
conversations. However, only 13 percent of Gordon Brown’s
conversations could be classified as negative but David Cameron had
the highest percentage of negative conversations, checking in at
almost 17 percent of all conversations being classified as
negative.


SM2 also allows users to understand where the conversations are
taking place. During this period, Nick Clegg had more
conversations (over 28 percent) taking place on Microblogs such as
Twitter. This is not surprising and actually previews his entire
social media campaign. Nick Clegg has his own personal Twitter feed
with 27,423 followers, which is substantial when compared to the
overall number of those following each party’s Twitter handles,
with the Lib Dems with 17,670 followers compared to the
Conservatives 28,771. Gordon Brown, on the other hand is seeing his
conversations occur in more mainstream social media platforms such
as blogs, wiki’s and message boards.
190,996 conversations were tracked between 15th April and 5th May,
the Debate period. This marked a significant event in UK politics
as it involved the first ever televised UK Prime Ministerial
debate. As a result, SM2 tracked nearly the double of the daily
conversations from the Pre-Debate period.
The most obvious information that can be gleaned from this is
the rise of Nick Clegg. Clegg’s volume of mentions increased from 6
percent (in pre-debate period) to over 23 percent of conversations.
The percentage of conversations mentioning Cameron increased to 28
percent, whereas Brown shrank considerably to 49 percent. During
this period each candidate saw their percentage of positive
conversations rise as compared to the Pre-Debate period. The
increase in volume for Clegg was also seen in the sentiment
analysis. Over 18 percent of Clegg mentions were positive compared
to 15 percent negative. This can be explained by the general
consensus that Clegg had the best performance during the initial
debate. Cameron received virtually the same amount of positive and
negative mentions during this period. Brown only received a
positive growth of 1 percent but this is expected considering the
fallback of the ‘bigotgate’ scandal.


During the Election period (6th May to 11th May), SM2 tracked
over 97,235 conversations. During the election, we see a doubling
of the average number of conversations per day to 19,447 compared
to 9,550 in the previous period. This emphasises just how popular
and interesting this particular election was. After the rise of
Clegg during the Debate period we see his mentions remain constant
at 23 percent during the Election Period. However, Cameron’s
increases to 29 percent while Gordon Brown still leads with 47
percent of the conversations.


However, this was not reflected in the sentiment analysis during
the Election Period. Each party leader after the election has more
negative sentiment than positive. Cameron’s negative sentiment
increased from 16 percent to 18 percent. Even Nick Clegg who
in both the previous periods had more positive than negative
sentiment, during the Election Period has seen his sentiment turn
more negative than positive. This could possibly be explained by
the fact that we now have a coalition government, a system of
governance that is not popular with the electorate. The report also
examines key topics discussed in ‘theme clouds’ associated with the
party leaders. SM2 found that the term ‘hung’ - referring to hung
parliament featured more prominently in negative conversations than
in positive.
David Eldridge, CEO of Alterian commented on the analysis, “This
year’s election is indisputably one of the most interesting
elections that we have ever seen and this has been reflected by the
amount of interest garnered both in social and traditional media.
There is no doubt that social media played a key part in driving
conversations and gathering support. While the candidates
predominantly used traditional media to drive their messages, the
electorate has shown the importance of social media as a means of
engagement.
Alterian SM2 is a social media monitoring and analysis solution
designed for PR and Marketing professionals. SM2 helps track
conversations, review positive/negative sentiment for brands,
clients, competitors and partners across social media channels such
as blogs, wikis, micro-blogs, social networks, video/photo sharing
sites and real-time alerts.
For more information on Alterian SM2, please visit
http://www.alterian.com/products/social-media-monitoring
# # # Ends # # #